This feeling of accomplishment contributes to what the ancient
Greeks called eudaimonia, which roughly translates to “well-being” or
“flourishing,” a concept that Dr. Seligman has borrowed for the title of
his new book, “Flourish.”
He has also created his own acronym, Perma, for what he defines as the
five crucial elements of well-being, each pursued for its own sake:
positive emotion, engagement (the feeling of being lost in a task),
relationships, meaning and accomplishment.
“Well-being cannot exist just in your own head,” he writes.
“Well-being is a combination of feeling good as well as actually having
meaning, good relationships and accomplishment.”
The positive
psychology movement has inspired efforts around the world to survey
people’s state of mind, like a new project in Britain to measure what
David Cameron, the prime minister, calls GWB, for general well-being.
Dr. Seligman says he’s glad to see governments measuring more than just the G.D.P., but he’s concerned that these surveys mainly ask people about their “life satisfaction.”
In
theory, life satisfaction might include the various elements of
well-being. But in practice, Dr. Seligman says, people’s answers to that
question are largely — more than 70 percent — determined by how they’re
feeling at the moment of the survey, not how they judge their lives
over all.
“Life satisfaction essentially measures cheerful moods,
so it is not entitled to a central place in any theory that aims to be
more than a happiology,” he writes in “Flourish.” By that standard, he
notes, a government could improve its numbers just by handing out the
kind of euphoriant drugs that Aldous Huxley described in “Brave New
World.”
So what should be measured instead? The best gauge so far
of flourishing, Dr. Seligman says, comes from a study of 23 European
countries by Felicia Huppert and Timothy So of the University of
Cambridge. Besides asking respondents about their moods, the researchers
asked about their relationships with others and their sense that they
were accomplishing something worthwhile
Excerpt from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/17/science/17tierney.html?_r=2&pagewanted=print
No comments:
Post a Comment