Primatologist Frans de Waal argues that morality predates religion. If this is the case in our evolutionary history then it would be possible for people to have morality without appealing to God or religion.
Troy Jollimore makes the argument:
"Jollimore [...] cites Socrates’ arguments in the
“Euthyphro” to assert that the need for a God-based morality is not just
unnecessary, but incoherent. So why do so many remain unconvinced?
Jollimore largely blames modern attempts to formulate an “ethics beyond
religion,” and the Kantian and utilitarian projects particularly, for
not offering a robust enough account of the moral life. Jollimore thinks
the more up-to-date “particularism” of Iris Murdoch and John McDowell
does a better job of integrating “theory and experience.” Their thought
in turn, Jollimore thinks, owes much to the unfashionable Aristotelian
notion of “practical wisdom,” and an ethical system based not on
“rules,” but on character, judgement, and the virtues. “Moral
particularism,” then, is a “secular ethics” that is based more in
practice than in theory; it’s also one that Jollimore concedes “shares
some important common ground with religious tradition.” (Copied from the NYT)
Jollimore's full essay entitled 'Godless but good' can be found here
No comments:
Post a Comment