I'll just copy-paste the publisher's description, which I take from the Center of Law and Religion Forum at St. John's Univ. :
How can we achieve and sustain a “decent”
liberal society, one that aspires to justice and equal opportunity for
all and inspires individuals to sacrifice for the common good? In this
book, a continuation of her explorations of emotions and the nature of
social justice, Martha Nussbaum makes the case for love. Amid the fears,
resentments, and competitive concerns that are endemic even to good
societies, public emotions rooted in love—in intense attachments to
things outside our control—can foster commitment to shared goals and
keep at bay the forces of disgust and envy.
Great democratic leaders, including
Abraham Lincoln, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr., have
understood the importance of cultivating emotions. But people attached
to liberalism sometimes assume that a theory of public sentiments would
run afoul of commitments to freedom and autonomy. Calling into question
this perspective, Nussbaum investigates historical proposals for a
public “civil religion” or “religion of humanity” by Jean-Jacques
Rousseau, Auguste Comte, John Stuart Mill, and Rabindranath Tagore. She
offers an account of how a decent society can use resources inherent in
human psychology, while limiting the damage done by the darker side of
our personalities. And finally she explores the cultivation of emotions
that support justice in examples drawn from literature, song, political
rhetoric, festivals, memorials, and even the design of public parks.
“Love is what gives respect for humanity
its life,” Nussbaum writes, “making it more than a shell.” Political
Emotions is a challenging and ambitious contribution to political
philosophy.
No comments:
Post a Comment